Open Access

Cytomegalovirus-induced immunopathology and its clinical consequences


DOI: 10.1186/2042-4280-2-6

Received: 27 January 2011

Accepted: 7 April 2011

Published: 7 April 2011


Human cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a ubiquitous DNA virus that causes severe disease in patients with immature or impaired immune systems. During active infection, CMV modulates host immunity, and CMV-infected patients often develop signs of immune dysfunction, such as immunosuppression and autoimmune phenomena. Furthermore, active viral infection has been observed in several autoimmune diseases, and case reports have linked primary CMV infection and the onset of autoimmune disorders. In addition, CMV infection promotes allograft rejection and graft-versus-host disease in solid organ and bone marrow transplant recipients, respectively, further implicating CMV in the genesis and maintenance of immunopathological phenomena. The mechanisms by which CMV could induce inhibition of host defense, inflammation, and autoimmunity are discussed, as is the treatment of virus-induced immunopathology with antivirals.

Human cytomegalovirus

Human cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a widespread agent that belongs to the Herpesviridae family [1]. Viral proteins are expressed in the immediate early (IE), early (E), and late (L) phases of CMV infection. Its genome contains more than 200 potential reading frames from which effector proteins can be generated, but merely one-quarter is committed to replication [2, 3]. Thus, the majority of viral proteins potentially modulates cellular responses in the host; of all herpesviruses, CMV expresses the most genes that alter innate and adaptive host immune responses [4].

During the acute phase of CMV infection, many cell types in an organ system can be infected, including endothelial cells, epithelial cells, smooth muscle cells, fibroblasts, neuronal cells, hepatocytes, trophoblasts, monocytes/macrophages (Mϕs), and dendritic cells (DCs) [5]. The virus typically is acquired early in life and can be transmitted by direct or indirect contact with infected body fluids. There are 3 forms of active CMV infection: a) primary infection, which occurs when the virus infects a CMV-naive host; b) endogenous infection in CMV-seropositive individuals who experience reactivation from latency, and c) exogenous reinfection in previously infected individuals who experience infection by a different strain [6].

Recent evidence shows that active and latent CMV infection induces sustained systemic inflammatory responses that are accompanied by a type 1 cytokine signature [7]. Viral persistence is established in all infected individuals and is chronically productive or occurs as a latent infection in which viral gene expression is limited [8].

Initiation of viral replication from latency not only is caused by immunosuppression but, like other viruses, such as HIV [9], also appears to be linked to activation of the immune system. For example, the virus can be reactivated by tumor necrosis factor (TNF)- α, which is released during inflammation. TNF-α binds to the TNF receptor on latently infected cells, generating signals that activate nuclear factor-kB (NF-kB). Consequently, the activated p65/p50 NF-kB heterodimer translocates into the nucleus and binds to the IE enhancer region of CMV, which initiates viral replication [10].

This molecular mechanism has a clinical correlate, wherein the reactivation of latent CMV has been associated with elevated serum levels of TNF-α in patients with atopic dermatitis [11] and sepsis [10, 12, 13]. In addition, CMV reactivates commonly following acute rejection of organ transplants and after acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in bone marrow transplant (BMT) recipients who have elevated TNF-α levels [1417].

Further, proinflammatory prostaglandins stimulate cyclic AMP, which then triggers viral reactivation [18]. Stress catecholamines can induce increases in cyclic AMP concentrations, leading to viral reactivation [6, 19]. Through such mechanisms, chronic inflammation is likely to mediate the reactivation of CMV.

Cells of the myeloid lineage are carriers of latent CMV [20, 21]. CMV can reactivate from latency by allogeneic stimulation of monocytes from seropositive donors [22]. Viral reactivation also occurs when mononuclear hematopoietic progenitors that are latently infected with CMV differentiate into mature DCs [23]. Thus, inflammation and cellular differentiation are events that reactivate CMV.

Clinical features of CMV infection and disease

CMV infection in immunocompetent hosts

In adults, primary CMV infection occurs in 0.1% to 0.6% of blood donors and typically is prolonged [24, 25]. Immunocompetent individuals with primary infections are frequently asymptomatic [25, 26], but CMV occasionally effects clinical illness-i.e., a self-limited mononucleosis-like syndrome. Clinically, the mononucleosis that is caused by CMV is similar to the more common Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) mononucleosis. Malaise, headache, and high fever are hallmarks of CMV mononucleosis and can persist for weeks. Other clinical abnormalities have been associated with CMV infection in normal hosts, including Guillain-Barré syndrome, meningoencephalitis, hemolytic anemia, and thrombocytopenia [1].

CMV infection in immunocompromised patients

CMV infections are among the most common infections that follow transplantation. In such transplant recipients, CMV infection manifests as a wide range of conditions, from asymptomatic viremia to CMV syndrome and tissue-invasive disease [27].

CMV infection in immunocompromised individuals causes disparate clinical syndromes in different groups of patients, and the severity of infection is proportional to the degree of immunosuppression. The most severe infections develop in allogeneic bone marrow and allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloSCT) recipients and in AIDS patients with low CD4+ counts. Symptomatic CMV infections are also observed often in solid organ transplant recipients.

The effects of CMV infection in transplant patients can be divided into 2 categories: direct effects of the infection that cause mononucleosis-like syndrome or tissue-invasive disease, and indirect effects [2830]. CMV tissue-invasive disease is suspected if high levels of CMV viremia develop and is confirmed by detection of the virus in the affected tissue by immunohistochemistry. The transplanted organ is the principal target of CMV infection in solid organ recipients [30]. This is not the case in BMT recipients, where CMV disease frequently manifests as interstitial pneumonia [31].

CMV is also associated with indirect effects, a term that encompasses the effects that are coupled to longer periods of low viral replication and that are caused in part by the host's immune response. Such effects include graft rejection and immunosuppression.

CMV infection in patients with autoimmune disorders

Recently, laboratory-based signs of active CMV infection have been observed in association with the onset and course of autoimmune diseases, as reviewed extensively below.

The virus as an immunopathological agent: autoimmunity, immunosuppression, and graft rejection

A. Autoimmunity

A1. Induction of autoantibodies

Autoimmune phenomena often develop in CMV-infected patients. For example, anti-phospholipid and anti-CD13 autoantibodies have been observed in CMV-infected BMT recipients [3234], and anti-CD13 has been linked to the development of chronic GVHD in these patients [35]. In solid organ transplant recipients, non-organ-specific autoantibodies, such as anti-endothelial cell, anti-smooth muscle cell, and anti-nucleus antibodies, are associated with CMV infection [36, 37], likely increasing the risk for humoral and chronic allograft rejection [38, 39]. In addition, hypergammaglobulinemia, cryoglobulinemia, and autoantibody production are features of CMV-induced mononucleosis and postperfusion syndrome [4042].

A2. Induction of vasculitides and scleroderma

The time course of active CMV infection and the onset of autoimmune disorders have been linked in previously healthy individuals. Notably, the presence of CMV replication has been associated with the development of autoimmune vasculitis and scleroderma, implicating virus-induced vasculopathy as a trigger of autoimmunity.

In fact, active CMV infection has been correlated with newly diagnosed necrotizing vasculitis [43], cutaneous vasculitis [44], and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)-associated vasculitis [45]. In all but one case, the symptoms improved with ganciclovir, in association or not with prednisone.

Further, a previously healthy woman who acquired CMV mononucleosis developed vasculitis with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (c-ANCA). This patient had extraordinarily high plasma levels of IL-5 and lymphotoxin-α and developed autoantibodies, concomitant with the primary CMV infection. After the onset of vasculitis, CMV genomes were detected in the blood and urine, and CMV antigens were observed in inflammatory lesions of the kidney, suggesting that CMV triggers and maintains the autoimmune process [42].

Finally, CMV RNA was detected in endothelial cells from skin biopsies in patients who presented with sudden onset of autoimmune sclerosis. One patient was treated with ganciclovir, which did not improve the clinical course of the disease [44].

A3. Induction of encephalitis associated with autoimmune phenomena

Recently, a previously healthy woman who suffered from active CMV experienced abrupt onset of encephalitis that was associated with autoimmune phenomena. Primary CMV infection was diagnosed by serology, and CMV DNA was detected in the cerebrospinal fluid and blood at the onset of symptoms. Long-course treatment with ganciclovir and intravenous immunoglobulins and decreasing doses of cortisone improved the neurological status. Although viral replication was halted and immunosuppressive therapy was discontinued, extremely low levels of CMV-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were detected for up to 10 months after disease onset. Conversely, high blood interferon (IFN)- γ levels were observed, suggesting enhancement of nonspecific immune mechanisms that were activated to compensate for the lack of CMV-specific T cell responses (Xu, Varani et al., manuscript in preparation). This case suggests that CMV infection in subjects with potentially hidden immune defects can enhance viral replication that triggers autoimmune phenomena.

Although it is possible that they are unrelated with regard to causation, the concurrent active CMV infection and onset of autoimmunity that were observed in these cases suggest that CMV induces autoimmunity in predisposed individuals.

A4. Increased risk for post-transplant diabetes mellitus

Viral infections, such as enteroviruses and mumps virus, are believed to provoke type I diabetes in genetically predisposed individuals [46]. Clinical evidence suggests that asymptomatic CMV infection and CMV disease are independent risk factors for early-onset diabetes mellitus in recipients of renal transplant (generally referred to as PTDM) [47, 48]. Further, CMV donor-positive/recipient-negative serostatus is a risk factor for the development of PTDM in pediatric renal transplant patients [49], and active CMV infection predisposes adult liver transplant patients to the development of PTDM [50]. The incidence of PTDM has declined significantly since the introduction of preemptive anti-CMV regimens, supporting the link between CMV and PTDM [51].

CMV damages β-cells by direct viral infection (the pancreas is a target organ of CMV infection [52]), through the cytotoxic effects of activated effector lymphocyte infiltrates, or the induction of proinflammatory cytokines [53]. There are limited experimental data on the inhibition of β-cell function by CMV, however, necessitating additional studies to demonstrate a causal relationship between CMV infection and PTDM.

A5. Active infection during autoimmune disorders

Current findings suggest that latent CMV can be reactivated by allogeneic stimulation in monocytes from seropositive donors [22] and that IFN-γ and TNF-α are necessary for the differentiation of CMV-permissive Mϕs [54]. These findings have clinical implications, because immune-mediated processes that involve T cell activation and inflammation may facilitate the reactivation of latent CMV in monocytes in vivo. Thus, the chronic inflammation that is associated with autoimmune diseases might provide the ideal microenvironment in which latent CMV can be reactivated in Mϕs; this inflammation can induce DC maturation, which can also provoke viral reactivation from latency [23].

Inflammatory bowel diseases and other enteropathies

CMV replicates efficiently in epithelial cells of the intestinal mucosa [55, 56] and is a major cause of graft failure after intestinal transplantation [57]. In recent years, many studies have focused on the pathogenic function of CMV replication in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Notably, CMV antigens have been found in 10% to 90% of biopsies from patients with IBD [5860]. Patients with inactive or mild to moderate ulcerative colitis (UC) [60, 61] and Crohn disease [6063] rarely show signs of CMV replication, whereas active CMV infection exists in 20% to 40% of steroid-refractory UC [6373], suggesting that CMV exacerbates inflammation.

Antiviral treatment in patients with steroid-resistant UC and active CMV infection has been efficacious in isolated cases or small groups of patients [63, 65, 68, 70, 71, 74], whereas other studies have reported clinical improvements in CMV colitis in the absence of antiviral medication [60, 75, 76], indicating the need for large, randomized, controlled studies to determine the true clinical value of antivirals in CMV-positive UC.

Notably, active CMV infection was diagnosed based on the detection of CMV in mucosal biopsy specimens from the colon by immunohistochemistry and PCR in the majority of these studies [60, 6366, 6870, 72, 77], whereas blood analysis, when performed, demonstrated low viral loads or the absence of viremia [63, 64]. These findings imply that CMV replication occurs primarily in the colon of patients with UC.

Further, recent evidence has shown that all patients with steroid-refractory UC who have experienced active CMV infection have been previously CMV-seropositive, suggesting that the virus reactivated at the site of inflammation during the active phase of disease [63]. Latently infected monocytes [20] are recruited to the site of colonic inflammation, where monocyte activation and differentiation can induce viral reactivation [22, 23]. Whether epithelial cells of the colonic mucosa carry latent CMV that contributes to viral reactivation is unknown.

Evidence indicates that CMV DNA can also be detected in intestinal biopsies of patients with common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) [78]. CVID is a heterogeneous disease that results in hypogammaglobulinemia, a propensity for infection and autoimmunity and that may also complicate with severe enteropathy. The role of CMV infection in triggering/worsening such disease is only partially understood; preliminary clinical observations suggest that an exaggerated T cell response to CMV may cause or exacerbate enteropathy in CVID [79], further underscoring the potential inflammatory role of CMV in the gastrointestinal tract.

Autoimmune disorders with major vascular involvement: vasculitis and systemic sclerosis

Increasing evidence suggests that in addition to hepatitis C (HCV), other viruses, such as CMV, EBV, HIV, and parvovirus B19, accompany systemic vasculitis [80]. In such disorders, CMV infection coincides with the onset of inflammatory disease [4245], as discussed, or with the initiation of immunosuppressive therapy [81]. Recently, IgM antibodies against CMV were observed more frequently in patients with c-ANCA-positive vasculitis compared with controls, while no other viral, bacterial and parasitic infections appeared to be involved [82]. Thus, CMV infection might initiate or maintain inflammation in vasculitides.

CMV has also been implicated as a trigger of vascular damage in systemic sclerosis [83]. The clinical onset of systemic sclerosis has been associated with the presence of an active CMV infection [44]. Further, autoantibodies that are specific for systemic sclerosis recognize the late CMV protein UL94 and are associated with the diffuse form of the disease but not the limited form, suggesting a correlation between the virus and disease severity [84, 85]. Notably, antibodies against UL94 induce apoptosis in endothelial cells and activate dermal fibroblasts in vitro, effecting 2 hallmarks of systemic sclerosis-vascular damage and fibrosis [86].

Other autoimmune disorders

Laboratory signs of acute CMV infection and anti-CMV have been observed in other autoimmune diseases. Subclinical systemic CMV infection develops in psoriatic patients and is associated with high levels of TNF-α [87]. Moreover, CMV DNA, specific antigens, and infectious virus particles have been detected in synovial tissue and fluid from the joints of 10% to 50% patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) [8891].

Active CMV infection is also frequent in children with SLE [92], and CMV has been implicated in its development and exacerbation [9397]. Serological signs of active CMV infection have been detected in 10% of patients with SLE, and the presence of viral infection is associated with higher disease activity scores [98]. Patients with SLE also have more robust humoral activity in response to CMV [99] and, in particular, to the CMV structural protein pp65 [100] compared with healthy donors and patients with other autoimmune disorders. In a recent study, CMV was the only infectious agent for which higher rates of IgM seropositivity and higher antibody titers were observed in SLE patients versus controls [101].

B. Immunosuppression

CMV infection (mainly primary infection) causes transient but substantial immunosuppression [102]. CMV effects immunosuppression in solid organ transplant recipients, potentiating superinfections with various pathogens [103]. Notably, meta-analyses of thousands of transplant recipients have demonstrated significant effects of anti-CMV prophylaxis in preventing bacterial and fungal [104] infections and bacterial and protozoan [105] infections. Further, in solid organ recipients, CMV replication influences the viral load of other viruses, such as human herpes virus (HHV)-6 and HHV-7 [106], and HCV load [107].

Owing to its immunosuppressive effect, CMV has also been suggested as a risk factor for the development of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLDs) in solid organ recipients, a pathological condition that is associated strictly with EBV replication [108]. In particular, CMV mismatch (donor positive/recipient negative) [109] and CMV disease [110] have been identified as general risk factors predisposing to the development of PTLD in solid organ transplant recipients. However, recent evidence shows no correlation between CMV disease and the development of PTLD [111113]. Therefore, whether CMV is associated to an increased risk of PTLD is debatable and further studies are needed to clarify this matter.

CMV is immunosuppressive in allo-SCT recipients and death appears to be mediated by invasive bacterial and fungal infections, of which invasive aspergillosis is the most significant complication [114]. In addition, by preventing CMV replication in BMT recipients, a reduction in mortality as a result of all types of infections is achieved [115]. Finally, an increased risk of death from infections has been shown in CMV-seropositive BMT recipients receiving grafts from seronegative donors [114, 116, 117], supporting the importance of transferring specific T cells with the graft to control CMV replication and its immunomodulatory effects in this patient's cohort.

C. Graft rejection

CMV promotes classical rejection and vasculopathy of an allograft, which impacts its longevity [6]. Several cohort studies have shown that CMV infection is associated with an increased risk of graft rejection in renal, liver, and lung transplant patients [118121].

Studies in heart transplant recipients report that acute rejection and accelerated coronary atherosclerosis are linked to asymptomatic and symptomatic CMV infection [122, 123]. Cardiac transplant vascular sclerosis, characterized histologically by diffuse concentric intimal proliferation that results in vessel stenosis and, ultimately, allograft failure [124], is highly associated with CMV in heart transplant recipients [125]. The higher incidence of viral DNA in explant vascular intima from patients with cardiac graft vascular sclerosis compared with explants without vasculopathy underscores the influence of CMV on the development of chronic rejection [126]. In addition, the early control of subclinical replication of CMV after cardiac transplantation by T cell immunity may reduce allograft vasculopathy and allograft rejection [127].

Chronic vasculopathy has also been associated with CMV in kidney transplant recipients [128]; bronchiolitis obliterans in lung recipients also correlates with CMV infection [119, 129]. Several randomized trials of antiviral prophylaxis and preemptive therapy have demonstrated that antivirals provide significant protection against CMV-associated allograft injury, providing the strongest evidence for the link between CMV infection and allograft rejection [104, 130133].

In BMT recipients, GVHD and CMV replication are pathogenetically associated; multiple studies show that GVHD and its treatment put patients at risk for CMV replication [134136]. In contrast, the role of CMV replication as a cause of GVHD is controversial. Opposite findings have been published on the effect of CMV replication on development of acute GVHD [116, 136139]. Several studies showed that an increased risk of chronic GVHD was associated with CMV viremia [35, 137, 140] and that BMT patients receiving pre-emptive therapy for CMV replication exhibited lower risks for severe chronic GVHD [141]. On the other hand, large randomized studies of prophylaxis with acyclovir or valacyclovir showing effects on CMV replication did not have any impact on the risk for GVHD [115, 142].

Mechanisms of CMV-induced immunopathology

A. Humoral autoimmunity

The mechanisms by which CMV interacts with the immune response to induce autoimmune phenomena are unknown. One possibility is viral mimicry [143]. The CMV genome harbors a series of genes that are homologous to cellular genes; consequently, the host response to viral determinants can crossreact with host tissues, leading to autoimmunity (Figure 1A). This mechanism likely explains the generation of pathogenetic autoantibodies that crossreact with CMV during systemic sclerosis [83].
Figure 1

Mechanisms by which CMV can induce host immunopathology. A; CMV-induced autoantibody production. B; Enhanced inflammation caused by the virus. C; CMV-induced vascular damage and vessel thickening. D; CMV-induced immunosuppression. TLR7/9; toll-like receptor 7/9, PDC; plasmacytoid dendritic cell, SMC; smooth muscle cell, 5-LO; 5-lypooxygenase, cox-2, cyclooxygenase-2, PGE2; prostaglandin E2, LTB4; leukotriene B4, MIF; macrophage migration inhibitory factor, MIP-1α; macrophage inflammatory protein 1-α, MIP-1β; macrophage inflammatory protein 1-β, VCAM-1; vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, PDGF; platelet-derived-growth factor, vIL-10; virally encoded IL-10. Modified from: Varani et al. "Cytomegalovirus-induced autoimmunity" in "Autoimmune Disorders: Symptoms, Diagnosis and Treatment". Editor: M.E. Petrov. ISBN: 978-1-61761-552-8; © 2010 Nova Science Publishers, Inc.

Humoral autoimmunity can also be elicited by nonspecific B cell activation that is caused by CMV. CMV is a polyclonal B-cell activator in vitro, and the B cell hyperresponse does not require viral replication [144]. In addition, CMV interacts with toll-like receptor (TLR) 7 and/or 9 in human plasmacytoid DCs, leading to secretion of IFN-α and B cell proliferation [145]. These DC-mediated events might facilitate polyclonal B cell activation and autoantibody production during CMV infection (Figure 1A).

B cell hyperactivation has clinical implications for infected patients, as demonstrated in transplant recipients, wherein autoantibodies contribute to the development of GVHD in CMV-infected alloSCT patients and to graft rejection in solid organ recipients [34, 35, 38, 39].

B. Inflammation

Primary and latent CMV infections induce chronic, systemic type 1 inflammatory responses [7]. Such sustained immune activation can augment alloimmune responses by enhancing the expansion and function of alloreactive T cells after transplantation. Moreover, the protracted elevation in serum IFN-γ levels can increase major histocompatibility complex (MHC) expression on graft cells, raising the risk of recognition by alloantigen-specific T cells. Both mechanisms can mediate allograft rejection.

The primary involvement of IFN-γ, T-bet (functional markers of Th1 CD4+ T cells), and granzyme B (a cytotoxic marker of CD8+ cells) in the pathogenesis of transplant glomerulopathy [146], a major risk factor for chronic graft rejection, has been demonstrated recently, implicating Th1-inducing CMV in chronic rejection in renal transplant recipients. Immune-mediated damage, involving CD8+ granzyme+ cytotoxic T cells, has also been observed in fetuses that are severely affected by congenital CMV infections (Gabrielli, Landini et al., manuscript in preparation). As discussed below, inflammation might enhance autoimmunity when CMV has reactivated in autoimmune diseases.

Generation of CD4+ CD28nullT cells

A unique subset of CD4+ T cells that lack the costimulatory molecule CD28 expand in patients with autoimmune diseases, such as RA, Wegener's granulomatosis, dermatomyositis and polymyositis, multiple sclerosis, and IBD [147150]. These cells have pathogenic properties in vitro [151], are a major source of Th1 cytokines in lesions in Wegener's granulomatosis [152], and are associated with early atherosclerotic vessel damage in RA patients [153]. In addition, CD4+CD28- and CD8+CD28- T cells are the predominant T cells that infiltrate inflamed muscles in patients with dermatomyositis and polymyositis, secreting IFN-γ on CMV-specific antigenic stimulation [150].

Notably, CD4+CD28- T cells appear to exist almost exclusively in CMV-infected individuals [150, 154]. In RA patients and healthy controls, CD4+CD28- lymphocytes react specifically with several CMV epitopes [151]. Thus, CMV replication in inflammatory lesions has been speculated to drive the differentiation of CD4+ T cells into pathogenic CD28null T cells, thereby aggravating local chronic inflammation in autoimmune disorders [151] (Figure 1B).

NF-kB and other inflammatory factors

In addition to inducing the end-stage differentiation of pathogenic T cells, CMV sustains chronic inflammation through other mechanisms. In vitro, CMV infection stimulates the translocation of NF-kB into the nucleus, which then upregulates TNF-α, leading to further activation of latent CMV and inflammatory responses [155].

CMV induces transient cyclooxygenase 2 expression in infected fibroblasts and the subsequent release of prostaglandin E2, a mediator of inflammation [156]. CMV also stimulates 5-lypoxygenase expression, which is crucial for the synthesis of leukotriene B4, a powerful chemoattractant [157] (Figure 1B). In addition, CMV infects various subsets of myeloid antigen-presenting cells (APCs) efficiently [158160] that, once infected, release myriad inflammatory mediators [160162] (Figure 1B). These mechanisms might sustain inflammation in CMV-infected lesions in autoimmune disorders and CMV-positive allografts.

C. Vascular damage and stenosis

Viral infections mediate the pathogenesis of vascular damage and vascular stenosis through various mechanisms, such as the infection of endothelial cells, causing cellular dysfunction or death; immune-mediated injury of the vessel wall; hemorheological dysfunction due to increased procoagulant activity; and migration and proliferation of smooth muscle cells [163165].

CMV can productively infect endothelial cells in vitro [166168] and CMV-infected endothelial cells are dysfunctional, due to diminished expression and activity of endothelial nitric oxide synthase [169]; augmented release of IL-8, a regulator of neutrophil migration [170]; increased secretion of the proinflammatory cytokine IL-1β; and upregulation of adhesion molecules that promote leukocyte adhesion [171] (Figure 1C).

The function of virus-induced cytokines and chemokines in the initiation and exacerbation of vascular damage is a growing area of research. CMV induces the release of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines and encodes CC and CXC chemokine homologs that recruit cellular infiltrates [165]. In addition, during host CD4+ T cell responses to CMV antigens, sufficient levels of IFN-γ and TNF-α are generated to induce the expression of fractalkine in endothelial cells [172]. On such upregulation, fractalkine mediates the recruitment and mobilization of natural killer (NK) cells and monocytes, which damage endothelial cells [173]. Thus, CMV-associated chronic endothelial cell inflammation and damage result from chemokine-mediated immunopathogenic effects (Figure 1C).

CMV infection can modulate the activity of the endothelium-from anticoagulant to procoagulant [174]-and induce platelet adherence and aggregation in infected endothelium [175]. Such effects can aggravate the vascular damage that is induced by CMV and induce vascular inflammation (Figure 1C). Endothelial cell damage, cytokine and chemokine release, and cellular dysfunction likely contribute to allograft-associated vasculopathy [165].

In addition to endothelial cells, CMV productively infects all cell types that are involved in vascular rejection, including smooth muscle cells (SMCs), Mϕs, and fibroblasts. The migration of SMCs from the media into the neointimal space and their subsequent proliferation are hallmarks of the development of vascular lesions during allograft vasculopathy.

CMV blocks apoptosis through various mechanisms [176], which effects the accumulation of SMCs. CMV also induces the production of potent stimuli of SMC proliferation, such as platelet-derived growth factor [177]. In addition, by generating the chemokine receptor US28, CMV enhances SMC migration [178]. The resulting accumulation of SMCs in the vessel intima on CMV infection leads to neointimal hyperplasia and vessel narrowing. Activated inflammatory cells, fibroblasts, and SMCs within vascular lesions are important local sources of factors that promote angiogenesis [179], which accelerates the development of transplant vascular sclerosis (Figure 1C).

D. Immunosuppression

Because CMV induces a robust and chronic antigenic response in immunocompetent individuals that increases with age [180], it has evolved several mechanisms to suppress and evade this response and persist in the host. Such mechanisms lead to transient but substantial immunosuppression against the virus itself and unrelated pathogens [181].

CMV-induced impairments that impede host immune responses have been demonstrated in vivo and in vitro. For example, patients with CMV mononucleosis experience a loss in delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions to recall antigens [182] and reduced lymphoproliferative responses to mitogens [183] and specific antigens [184]. In immunocompetent adolescents with asymptomatic primary CMV infections, lymphocyte proliferation in response to CMV is less robust than in seropositive controls [26]. Specific cell-mediated immunity is also attenuated in children with congenital [185] and acquired [186] CMV infections.

In vitro, CMV suppresses lymphocyte proliferation to T cell mitogens and prevents lymphocytes and monocytes from producing and responding to immune mediators, such as IL-1 and IL-2 [187]. In addition, CMV inhibits cytotoxic and NK cell activity [188, 189]. CMV suppresses bone marrow myelopoiesis by infecting hematopoietic progenitors and their progeny directly or infecting stromal cells and altering the bone marrow microenvironment [190192].

These observations are supported by evidence of impaired APC function on infection with CMV, including altered phagocytosis, differentiation, migration and maturation, and reduced expression of MHC molecules, preventing effective antigen presentation to T cells [160, 162, 187, 193199]. CMV impairs the ability of plasmacytoid DCs to induce allogeneic T cell proliferation [145], indicating broad virus-induced inhibition of various APC subsets.

The secretion of cmvIL-10 during CMV infection might aid the virus in infecting and inhibiting DCs chronically [200, 201] (Figure 1D). CMV might use these mechanisms as immunoevasive strategies and simultaneously effect robust and broad inhibition of host immunity.

Treatment of virus-induced immunopathology

Despite the substantial progress in transplantology, CMV continues to be a significant cause of morbidity in transplant recipients, due to its many direct and indirect effects. While the direct effects of CMV infection are well managed by treatment with ganciclovir or its prodrug, valganciclovir, the optimal therapy for treating and preventing virus-induced immunopathology remains undefined [6]. Studies indicate that antiviral prophylaxis provides significant protection against CMV-associated allograft injury and immunosuppression [104, 105, 130, 131]. However, no guidelines on the treatment of virus-induced immunopathology in transplant recipients exist. Similarly, little is known about the treatment of viral immunomodulation in patients with autoimmune disorders.

When CMV replication is detected in patients with autoimmune diseases, clinicians are faced with a therapeutic dilemma: should antiviral therapy be initiated and immunosuppression be reduced to generate specific antiviral immune responses, despite the risk of exacerbating the autoimmune disorder? Or, should the doses of immunosuppressive agents be increased to suppress inflammatory activity? Similarly, the treatment of CMV infection that accompanies allograft rejection in solid organ transplant recipients is complicated, because the modulation of iatrogenic immunosuppression can oppositely influence CMV replication and the rejection episode [202].

As discussed, in 5 patients with vasculitis who tested positive for active CMV infection, remission of the autoimmunity was achieved on treatment with ganciclovir alone or with CMV immunoglobulin and/or cortisone [4345]. We also effected a successful outcome in a patient who developed encephalitis and autoimmune phenomena on primary CMV infection after a long-course treatment with ganciclovir and intravenous immunoglobulins and decreasing doses of prednisone (Xu, Varani et al., manuscript in preparation). The positive outcomes in these cases suggest that a 2-pronged approach-comprising the inhibition of viral replication by antivirals and immunomodulation by intravenous IgG [203] and/or prednisone-is warranted when the onset of autoimmune disorders coincides with active CMV infection.

Increasing evidence shows that CMV exacerbates the clinical outcome of UC, prompting the hypothesis that antiviral therapy or another regimen that impedes viral replication is beneficial when CMV infection is histologically proven at the site of inflammation [63]. To this end, 3 therapeutic options have been considered; 1. administration of antiviral compounds, 2. modulation of immunosuppression, and 3. modulation of inflammation.

Many studies have reported successful outcomes using antivirals, such as ganciclovir and oral valganciclovir, in isolated cases or small groups of patients with steroid-refractory UC and active CMV infection [63, 65, 68, 70, 71, 74]. Recently, it has been suggested that all UC patients with severe colitis that is refractory to immunosuppressants be tested for CMV reactivation and receive antiviral therapy if colonic CMV is detected [204].

Modulating immunosuppressive therapy elicits stronger anti-CMV immune responses; this option has been used successfully alone [64] or with antivirals [64, 67, 71].

Because CMV reactivation depends strictly on inflammation [10], treatments that reduce colonic inflammation, such as anti-TNF-α compounds and leukapheresis, can reduce viral replication in UC patients, as shown by 2 recent reports [74, 205].

Thus, the use of antivirals and indirect suppression of viral replication might be effective treatments for CMV-positive refractory UC. However, large, randomized, controlled studies are needed to determine their efficacies in UC patients and other patients with autoimmune disorders who experience active CMV infection.


During acute CMV infection, patients often suffer from immunological dysfunctions. Autoimmune phenomena are common in CMV-infected patients, and various autoantibodies have been detected in patients with systemic CMV infection [3234, 36, 37, 42]. Nonspecific hyperactivation of humoral immunity can impede the development of specific B cell responses-a potential mechanism of viral immune evasion. Such a phenomenon has clinical implications for infected patients, as demonstrated in transplant recipients-autoantibodies mediate the development of GVHD in CMV-infected alloSCT patients and graft rejection in solid organ recipients [34, 35, 38, 39] (Figure 2).
Figure 2

CMV-induced immunopathology in various groups of patients--previously healthy subjects, immunodepressed transplant recipients, and patients with autoimmune disorders. Modified from: Varani et al. "Cytomegalovirus-induced autoimmunity" in "Autoimmune Disorders: Symptoms, Diagnosis and Treatment". Editor: M.E. Petrov. ISBN: 978-1-61761-552-8; © 2010 Nova Science Publishers, Inc.

In potentially predisposed patients, primary CMV infections can trigger autoimmune disorders, and vasculitides and scleroderma develop concomitantly with or immediately after active CMV infection in previously healthy, immunocompetent subjects [4245]. In addition to acute systemic CMV infection, low-grade CMV replication appears to be a frequent event in autoimmune disorders [206]. CMV can accelerate the progression of autoimmune disorders by mimicking autoimmune-mediated tissue destruction and aggravating inflammation. Local viral replication is also associated with chronic perivascular inflammation in solid organ transplant recipients (Figure 2). In these patients, CMV persists in the allograft, but few cells are infected directly by CMV. These findings contrast the global effects that CMV has on the acceleration of vascular stenosis and chronic rejection, suggesting that CMV does not promote vascular disease through direct infection of vessels; instead, it likely acts by indirect mechanisms that in part involve the immune system [179].

Paradoxically, CMV infection, principally primary infection, induces transient but significant immunosuppression, which has clinical consequences during active CMV infection in transplant recipients; such patients develop increased risk for opportunistic infections that can be reduced significantly by antiviral prophylaxis [103105, 114] (Figure 2).

Herpesviruses are archetypal persistent infectious agents that, even in individuals with essentially normal immunity, escape occasionally from normal immune control and cause symptomatic disease. Of all herpesviruses, CMV harbors the most genes that are committed to altering innate and adaptive host immunity [4], and a significant fraction of the T cell repertoire in CMV carriers is directed against this virus [1]. Because CMV persists in the host, it can be erroneously implicated in the pathogenesis of various diseases despite its lack of involvement. Nevertheless, examples of immunopathology that are attributed to CMV continue to accumulate, suggesting that this virus has critical immunomodulatory functions.



allogeneic stem cell transplant


antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody


antigen presenting cell


bone marrow transplant recipient


human cytomegalovirus


common variable immunodeficiency


dendritic cell




Epstein-Barr virus


graft-versus-host disease


hepatitis C virus


human herpes virus


inflammatory bowel disease


immediate early






major histocompatibility complex




nuclear factor-kB


natural killer


post-transplant diabetes mellitus


post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder


rheumatoid arthritis


systemic lupus erythematosus


smooth muscle cell


toll-like receptor


tumor necrosis factor


ulcerative colitis.



This work was supported by the Italian Ministry of University and Scientific Research (PRIN 2007 to M.P.L.) and RFO, University of Bologna (S.V. and M.P.L.). The manuscript was edited by Blue Pencil Science.

Authors’ Affiliations

Section of Microbiology, Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Bologna


  1. Mocarski ES, Shenk T, Pass R: Cytomegaloviruses. Fields Virology. Edited by: Knipe D, Howley P. 2007, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2: 2701-2772. FifthGoogle Scholar
  2. Murphy E, Yu D, Grimwood J, Schmutz J, Dickson M, Jarvis MA, Hahn G, Nelson JA, Myers RM, Shenk TE: Coding potential of laboratory and clinical strains of human cytomegalovirus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003, 100: 14976-14981. 10.1073/pnas.2136652100.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Dunn W, Chou C, Li H, Hai R, Patterson D, Stolc V, Zhu H, Liu F: Functional profiling of a human cytomegalovirus genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003, 100: 14223-14228. 10.1073/pnas.2334032100.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Miller-Kittrell M, Sparer TE: Feeling manipulated: cytomegalovirus immune manipulation. Virol J. 2009, 6: 4-10.1186/1743-422X-6-4.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Sinzger C, Jahn G: Human cytomegalovirus cell tropism and pathogenesis. Intervirology. 1996, 39: 302-319.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Rubin RH: The pathogenesis and clinical management of cytomegalovirus infection in the organ transplant recipient: the end of the 'silo hypothesis'. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2007, 20: 399-407. 10.1097/QCO.0b013e328285a358.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. van de Berg PJ, Heutinck KM, Raabe R, Minnee RC, Young SL, van Donselaar-van der Pant KA, Bemelman FJ, van Lier RA, ten Berge IJ: Human cytomegalovirus induces systemic immune activation characterized by a type 1 cytokine signature. J Infect Dis. 2010, 202: 690-699. 10.1086/655472.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Britt W: Manifestations of human cytomegalovirus infection: proposed mechanisms of acute and chronic disease. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2008, 325: 417-470. full_text.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Decrion AZ, Dichamp I, Varin A, Herbein G: HIV and inflammation. Curr HIV Res. 2005, 3: 243-259. 10.2174/1570162054368057.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Docke WD, Prosch S, Fietze E, Kimel V, Zuckermann H, Klug C, Syrbe U, Kruger DH, von Baehr R, Volk HD: Cytomegalovirus reactivation and tumour necrosis factor. Lancet. 1994, 343: 268-269. 10.1016/S0140-6736(94)91116-9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Docke WD, Kiessling C, Worm M, Friedrich M, Pruss A, Weitz M, Prosch S, Kern F, Volk HD, Sterry W, et al: Subclinical activation of latent cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and anti-CMV immune response in patients with atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol. 2003, 148: 954-963. 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2003.05263.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Kutza AS, Muhl E, Hackstein H, Kirchner H, Bein G: High incidence of active cytomegalovirus infection among septic patients. Clin Infect Dis. 1998, 26: 1076-1082. 10.1086/520307.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. von Muller L, Klemm A, Durmus N, Weiss M, Suger-Wiedeck H, Schneider M, Hampl W, Mertens T: Cellular immunity and active human cytomegalovirus infection in patients with septic shock. J Infect Dis. 2007, 196: 1288-1295. 10.1086/522429.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Guyotat D, Gibert R, Chomel J, Archimbaud E, Bossard S, Maupas J, Fiere D, Aymard M: Incidence and prognosis of cytomegalovirus infections following allogenic bone marrow transplantation. J Med Virol. 1987, 23: 393-399. 10.1002/jmv.1890230412.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Koskinen PK, Kallio EA, Tikkanen JM, Sihvola RK, Hayry PJ, Lemstrom KB: Cytomegalovirus infection and cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Transpl Infect Dis. 1999, 1: 115-126. 10.1034/j.1399-3062.1999.010205.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Lautenschlager I, Hockerstedt K, Taskinen E, von Willebrand E: Expression of adhesion molecules and their ligands in liver allografts during cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and acute rejection. Transpl Int. 1996, 9 (Suppl 1): S213-215. 10.1111/j.1432-2277.1996.tb01612.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Ricart MJ, Malaise J, Moreno A, Crespo M, Fernandez-Cruz L: Cytomegalovirus: occurrence, severity, and effect on graft survival in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2005, 20 (Suppl 2): ii25-ii32. 10.1093/ndt/gfh1079. ii62PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Kline JN, Hunninghake GM, He B, Monick MM, Hunninghake GW: Synergistic activation of the human cytomegalovirus major immediate early promoter by prostaglandin E2 and cytokines. Exp Lung Res. 1998, 24: 3-14. 10.3109/01902149809046050.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Prosch S, Wendt CE, Reinke P, Priemer C, Oppert M, Kruger DH, Volk HD, Docke WD: A novel link between stress and human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infection: sympathetic hyperactivity stimulates HCMV activation. Virology. 2000, 272: 357-365. 10.1006/viro.2000.0367.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Taylor-Wiedeman J, Sissons JG, Borysiewicz LK, Sinclair JH: Monocytes are a major site of persistence of human cytomegalovirus in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. J Gen Virol. 1991, 72 (Pt 9): 2059-2064. 10.1099/0022-1317-72-9-2059.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Mendelson M, Monard S, Sissons P, Sinclair J: Detection of endogenous human cytomegalovirus in CD34+ bone marrow progenitors. J Gen Virol. 1996, 77 (Pt 12): 3099-3102. 10.1099/0022-1317-77-12-3099.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Soderberg-Naucler C, Fish KN, Nelson JA: Reactivation of latent human cytomegalovirus by allogeneic stimulation of blood cells from healthy donors. Cell. 1997, 91: 119-126. 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)80014-3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Reeves MB, MacAry PA, Lehner PJ, Sissons JG, Sinclair JH: Latency, chromatin remodeling, and reactivation of human cytomegalovirus in the dendritic cells of healthy carriers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005, 102: 4140-4145. 10.1073/pnas.0408994102.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Hecker M, Qiu D, Marquardt K, Bein G, Hackstein H: Continuous cytomegalovirus seroconversion in a large group of healthy blood donors. Vox Sang. 2004, 86: 41-44. 10.1111/j.0042-9007.2004.00388.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Ziemann M, Unmack A, Steppat D, Juhl D, Gorg S, Hennig H: The natural course of primary cytomegalovirus infection in blood donors. Vox Sang. 2010, 99: 24-33. 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2009.01306.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Zanghellini F, Boppana SB, Emery VC, Griffiths PD, Pass RF: Asymptomatic primary cytomegalovirus infection: virologic and immunologic features. J Infect Dis. 1999, 180: 702-707. 10.1086/314939.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Kotton CN: Management of cytomegalovirus infection in solid organ transplantation. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2010, 6: 711-721. 10.1038/nrneph.2010.141.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Pereyra F, Rubin RH: Prevention and treatment of cytomegalovirus infection in solid organ transplant recipients. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2004, 17: 357-361. 10.1097/01.qco.0000136933.67920.dd.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Freeman RB: The 'indirect' effects of cytomegalovirus infection. Am J Transplant. 2009, 9: 2453-2458. 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02824.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Fishman JA, Emery V, Freeman R, Pascual M, Rostaing L, Schlitt HJ, Sgarabotto D, Torre-Cisneros J, Uknis ME: Cytomegalovirus in transplantation - challenging the status quo. Clin Transplant. 2007, 21: 149-158. 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2006.00618.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Barry SM, Johnson MA, Janossy G: Cytopathology or immunopathology? The puzzle of cytomegalovirus pneumonitis revisited. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2000, 26: 591-597. 10.1038/sj.bmt.1702562.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Hebart H, Einsele H, Klein R, Fischer I, Buhler S, Dietz K, Jahn G, Berg PA, Kanz L, Muller CA: CMV infection after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation is associated with the occurrence of various autoantibodies and monoclonal gammopathies. Br J Haematol. 1996, 95: 138-144. 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1996.7592380.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Mengarelli A, Minotti C, Palumbo G, Arcieri P, Gentile G, Iori AP, Arcese W, Mandelli F, Avvisati G: High levels of antiphospholipid antibodies are associated with cytomegalovirus infection in unrelated bone marrow and cord blood allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Br J Haematol. 2000, 108: 126-131. 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2000.01812.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Soderberg C, Sumitran-Karuppan S, Ljungman P, Moller E: CD13-specific autoimmunity in cytomegalovirus-infected immunocompromised patients. Transplantation. 1996, 61: 594-600. 10.1097/00007890-199602270-00014.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Soderberg C, Larsson S, Rozell BL, Sumitran-Karuppan S, Ljungman P, Moller E: Cytomegalovirus-induced CD13-specific autoimmunity--a possible cause of chronic graft-vs-host disease. Transplantation. 1996, 61: 600-609. 10.1097/00007890-199602270-00015.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Toyoda M, Galfayan K, Galera OA, Petrosian A, Czer LS, Jordan SC: Cytomegalovirus infection induces anti-endothelial cell antibodies in cardiac and renal allograft recipients. Transpl Immunol. 1997, 5: 104-111. 10.1016/S0966-3274(97)80050-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Varani S, Muratori L, De Ruvo N, Vivarelli M, Lazzarotto T, Gabrielli L, Bianchi FB, Bellusci R, Landini MP: Autoantibody appearance in cytomegalovirus-infected liver transplant recipients: correlation with antigenemia. J Med Virol. 2002, 66: 56-62. 10.1002/jmv.2111.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Fredrich R, Toyoda M, Czer LS, Galfayan K, Galera O, Trento A, Freimark D, Young S, Jordan SC: The clinical significance of antibodies to human vascular endothelial cells after cardiac transplantation. Transplantation. 1999, 67: 385-391. 10.1097/00007890-199902150-00008.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Dubel L, Farges O, Johanet C, Sebagh M, Bismuth H: High incidence of antitissue antibodies in patients experiencing chronic liver allograft rejection. Transplantation. 1998, 65: 1072-1075. 10.1097/00007890-199804270-00011.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Kantor GL, Goldberg LS, Johnson BL, Derechin MM, Barnett EV: Immunologic abnormalities induced by postperfusion cytomegalovirus infection. Ann Intern Med. 1970, 73: 553-558.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Wager O, Rasanen JA, Hagman A, Klemola E: Mixed cryoimmunoglobulinaemia in infectious mononucleois and Cytomegalovirus mononucleosis. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol. 1968, 34: 345-361. 10.1159/000230129.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Varani S, Mastroianni A, Frascaroli G, Tammik C, Rahbar A, Christensson M, Rossini G, Landini MP, Soderberg-Naucler C: Generalized Wegener's granulomatosis in an immunocompetent adult after cytomegalovirus mononucleosis and bacterial urinary tract infection. Arthritis Rheum. 2009, 60: 1558-1562. 10.1002/art.24487.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Meyer MF, Hellmich B, Kotterba S, Schatz H: Cytomegalovirus infection in systemic necrotizing vasculitis: causative agent or opportunistic infection?. Rheumatol Int. 2000, 20: 35-38. 10.1007/s002960000063.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Magro CM, Crowson AN, Ferri C: Cytomegalovirus-associated cutaneous vasculopathy and scleroderma sans inclusion body change. Hum Pathol. 2007, 38: 42-49. 10.1016/j.humpath.2006.06.002.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Perez-Mercado AE, Vila-Perez S: Cytomegalovirus as a trigger for systemic lupus erythematosus. J Clin Rheumatol. 2010, 16: 335-337.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Jaeckel E, Manns M, Von Herrath M: Viruses and diabetes. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2002, 958: 7-25. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2002.tb02943.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Hjelmesaeth J, Sagedal S, Hartmann A, Rollag H, Egeland T, Hagen M, Nordal KP, Jenssen T: Asymptomatic cytomegalovirus infection is associated with increased risk of new-onset diabetes mellitus and impaired insulin release after renal transplantation. Diabetologia. 2004, 47: 1550-1556. 10.1007/s00125-004-1499-z.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Hjelmesaeth J, Hartmann A, Kofstad J, Stenstrom J, Leivestad T, Egeland T, Fauchald P: Glucose intolerance after renal transplantation depends upon prednisolone dose and recipient age. Transplantation. 1997, 64: 979-983. 10.1097/00007890-199710150-00008.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Burroughs TE, Swindle JP, Salvalaggio PR, Lentine KL, Takemoto SK, Bunnapradist S, Brennan DC, Schnitzler MA: Increasing incidence of new-onset diabetes after transplant among pediatric renal transplant patients. Transplantation. 2009, 88: 367-373. 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181ae67f0.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Driscoll CJ, Cashion AK, Hathaway DK, Thompson C, Conley Y, Gaber O, Vera S, Shokouh-Amiri H: Posttransplant diabetes mellitus in liver transplant recipients. Prog Transplant. 2006, 16: 110-116.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Valderhaug TG, Hjelmesaeth J, Rollag H, Leivestad T, Roislien J, Jenssen T, Hartmann A: Reduced incidence of new-onset posttransplantation diabetes mellitus during the last decade. Transplantation. 2007, 84: 1125-1130. 10.1097/ ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Kamalkumar BS, Agarwal SK, Garg P, Dinda A, Tiwari SC: Acute pancreatitis with CMV papillitis and cholangiopathy in a renal transplant recipient. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2009, 13: 389-391. 10.1007/s10157-008-0123-9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Hjelmesaeth J, Muller F, Jenssen T, Rollag H, Sagedal S, Hartmann A: Is there a link between cytomegalovirus infection and new-onset posttransplantation diabetes mellitus? Potential mechanisms of virus induced beta-cell damage. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2005, 20: 2311-2315. 10.1093/ndt/gfi033.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Soderberg-Naucler C, Fish KN, Nelson JA: Interferon-gamma and tumor necrosis factor-alpha specifically induce formation of cytomegalovirus-permissive monocyte-derived macrophages that are refractory to the antiviral activity of these cytokines. J Clin Invest. 1997, 100: 3154-3163. 10.1172/JCI119871.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Goodgame RW: Gastrointestinal cytomegalovirus disease. Ann Intern Med. 1993, 119: 924-935.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Esclatine A, Lemullois M, Servin AL, Quero AM, Geniteau-Legendre M: Human cytomegalovirus infects Caco-2 intestinal epithelial cells basolaterally regardless of the differentiation state. J Virol. 2000, 74: 513-517. 10.1128/JVI.74.1.513-517.2000.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Chiereghin A, Gabrielli L, Zanfi C, Petrisli E, Lauro A, Piccirilli G, Baccolini F, Dazzi A, Cescon M, Morelli MC, et al: Monitoring cytomegalovirus T-cell immunity in small bowel/multivisceral transplant recipients. Transplant Proc. 2010, 42: 69-73. 10.1016/j.transproceed.2009.12.030.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Rahbar A, Bostrom L, Lagerstedt U, Magnusson I, Soderberg-Naucler C, Sundqvist VA: Evidence of active cytomegalovirus infection and increased production of IL-6 in tissue specimens obtained from patients with inflammatory bowel diseases. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2003, 9: 154-161. 10.1097/00054725-200305000-00002.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Dimitroulia E, Spanakis N, Konstantinidou AE, Legakis NJ, Tsakris A: Frequent detection of cytomegalovirus in the intestine of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2006, 12: 879-884. 10.1097/01.mib.0000231576.11678.57.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Kim JJ, Simpson N, Klipfel N, Debose R, Barr N, Laine L: Cytomegalovirus infection in patients with active inflammatory bowel disease. Dig Dis Sci. 2010, 55: 1059-1065. 10.1007/s10620-010-1126-4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Knosel T, Schewe C, Petersen N, Dietel M, Petersen I: Prevalence of infectious pathogens in Crohn's disease. Pathol Res Pract. 2009, 205: 223-230. 10.1016/j.prp.2008.04.018.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Kojima T, Watanabe T, Hata K, Shinozaki M, Yokoyama T, Nagawa H: Cytomegalovirus infection in ulcerative colitis. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2006, 41: 706-711. 10.1080/00365520500408584.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Domenech E, Vega R, Ojanguren I, Hernandez A, Garcia-Planella E, Bernal I, Rosinach M, Boix J, Cabre E, Gassull MA: Cytomegalovirus infection in ulcerative colitis: a prospective, comparative study on prevalence and diagnostic strategy. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2008, 14: 1373-1379. 10.1002/ibd.20498.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Yoshino T, Nakase H, Ueno S, Uza N, Inoue S, Mikami S, Matsuura M, Ohmori K, Sakurai T, Nagayama S, et al: Usefulness of quantitative real-time PCR assay for early detection of cytomegalovirus infection in patients with ulcerative colitis refractory to immunosuppressive therapies. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2007, 13: 1516-1521. 10.1002/ibd.20253.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Wada Y, Matsui T, Matake H, Sakurai T, Yamamoto J, Kikuchi Y, Yorioka M, Tsuda S, Yao T, Yao S, et al: Intractable ulcerative colitis caused by cytomegalovirus infection: a prospective study on prevalence, diagnosis, and treatment. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003, 46: S59-65. 10.1007/s10350-004-6497-1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. Takahashi Y, Tange T: Prevalence of cytomegalovirus infection in inflammatory bowel disease patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004, 47: 722-726. 10.1007/s10350-003-0117-3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Papadakis KA, Tung JK, Binder SW, Kam LY, Abreu MT, Targan SR, Vasiliauskas EA: Outcome of cytomegalovirus infections in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001, 96: 2137-2142. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03949.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  68. Minami M, Ohta M, Ohkura T, Ando T, Ohmiya N, Niwa Y, Goto H: Cytomegalovirus infection in severe ulcerative colitis patients undergoing continuous intravenous cyclosporine treatment in Japan. World J Gastroenterol. 2007, 13: 754-760.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Kuwabara A, Okamoto H, Suda T, Ajioka Y, Hatakeyama K: Clinicopathologic characteristics of clinically relevant cytomegalovirus infection in inflammatory bowel disease. J Gastroenterol. 2007, 42: 823-829. 10.1007/s00535-007-2103-3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  70. Kambham N, Vij R, Cartwright CA, Longacre T: Cytomegalovirus infection in steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis: a case-control study. Am J Surg Pathol. 2004, 28: 365-373. 10.1097/00000478-200403000-00009.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  71. Cottone M, Pietrosi G, Martorana G, Casa A, Pecoraro G, Oliva L, Orlando A, Rosselli M, Rizzo A, Pagliaro L: Prevalence of cytomegalovirus infection in severe refractory ulcerative and Crohn's colitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001, 96: 773-775. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03620.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  72. Barahona-Garrido J, Martinez-Benitez B, Espinosa-Cardenas E, Sarti HM, Gutierrez-Manjarrez JI, Aguirre-Gutierrez R, Tellez-Avila FI, Coss-Adame E, Garcia-Juarez I, Yamamoto-Furusho JK: Cytomegalovirus infection in patients who required colectomy for toxic megacolon or severe steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis. Dig Dis Sci. 2010, 55: 867-868. 10.1007/s10620-009-1109-5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  73. Maher MM, Nassar MI: Acute cytomegalovirus infection is a risk factor in refractory and complicated inflammatory bowel disease. Dig Dis Sci. 2009, 54: 2456-2462. 10.1007/s10620-008-0639-6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  74. Criscuoli V, Mocciaro F, Orlando A, Rizzuto MR, Renda MC, Cottone M: Cytomegalovirus disappearance after treatment for refractory ulcerative colitis in 2 patients treated with infliximab and 1 patient with leukapheresis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2009, 15: 810-811. 10.1002/ibd.20742.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  75. Matsuoka K, Iwao Y, Mori T, Sakuraba A, Yajima T, Hisamatsu T, Okamoto S, Morohoshi Y, Izumiya M, Ichikawa H, et al: Cytomegalovirus is frequently reactivated and disappears without antiviral agents in ulcerative colitis patients. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007, 102: 331-337. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00989.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  76. Leveque N, Brixi-Benmansour H, Reig T, Renois F, Talmud D, Brodard V, Coste JF, De Champs C, Andreoletti L, Diebold MD: Low frequency of cytomegalovirus infection during exacerbations of inflammatory bowel diseases. J Med Virol. 2010, 82: 1694-1700. 10.1002/jmv.21877.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  77. Kishore J, Ghoshal U, Ghoshal UC, Krishnani N, Kumar S, Singh M, Ayyagari A: Infection with cytomegalovirus in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: prevalence, clinical significance and outcome. J Med Microbiol. 2004, 53: 1155-1160. 10.1099/jmm.0.45629-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  78. Daniels JA, Lederman HM, Maitra A, Montgomery EA: Gastrointestinal tract pathology in patients with common variable immunodeficiency (CVID): a clinicopathologic study and review. Am J Surg Pathol. 2007, 31: 1800-1812. 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3180cab60c.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  79. Raeiszadeh M, Kopycinski J, Paston SJ, Diss T, Lowdell M, Hardy GA, Hislop AD, Workman S, Dodi A, Emery V, et al: The T cell response to persistent herpes virus infections in common variable immunodeficiency. Clin Exp Immunol. 2006, 146: 234-242. 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2006.03209.x.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  80. Mandell BF, Calabrese LH: Infections and systemic vasculitis. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 1998, 10: 51-57. 10.1097/00002281-199801000-00008.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  81. Mori T, Kameda H, Ogawa H, Iizuka A, Sekiguchi N, Takei H, Nagasawa H, Tokuhira M, Tanaka T, Saito Y, et al: Incidence of cytomegalovirus reactivation in patients with inflammatory connective tissue diseases who are under immunosuppressive therapy. J Rheumatol. 2004, 31: 1349-1351.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Lidar M, Lipschitz N, Langevitz P, Barzilai O, Ram M, Porat-Katz BS, Pagnoux C, Guilpain P, Sinico RA, Radice A, et al: Infectious serologies and autoantibodies in Wegener's granulomatosis and other vasculitides: novel associations disclosed using the Rad BioPlex 2200. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009, 1173: 649-657. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04641.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  83. Lunardi C, Bason C, Corrocher R, Puccetti A: Induction of endothelial cell damage by hCMV molecular mimicry. Trends Immunol. 2005, 26: 19-24. 10.1016/ ArticleGoogle Scholar
  84. Namboodiri AM, Rocca KM, Pandey JP: IgG antibodies to human cytomegalovirus late protein UL94 in patients with systemic sclerosis. Autoimmunity. 2004, 37: 241-244. 10.1080/08916930410001710046.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  85. Lunardi C, Bason C, Navone R, Millo E, Damonte G, Corrocher R, Puccetti A: Systemic sclerosis immunoglobulin G autoantibodies bind the human cytomegalovirus late protein UL94 and induce apoptosis in human endothelial cells. Nat Med. 2000, 6: 1183-1186. 10.1038/80533.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  86. Lunardi C, Dolcino M, Peterlana D, Bason C, Navone R, Tamassia N, Beri R, Corrocher R, Puccetti A: Antibodies against human cytomegalovirus in the pathogenesis of systemic sclerosis: a gene array approach. PLoS Med. 2006, 3: e2-10.1371/journal.pmed.0030002.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  87. Asadullah K, Prosch S, Audring H, Buttnerova I, Volk HD, Sterry W, Docke WD: A high prevalence of cytomegalovirus antigenaemia in patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis: an association with systemic tumour necrosis factor alpha overexpression. Br J Dermatol. 1999, 141: 94-102. 10.1046/j.1365-2133.1999.02926.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  88. Einsele H, Steidle M, Muller CA, Fritz P, Zacher J, Schmidt H, Saal JG: Demonstration of cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA and anti-CMV response in the synovial membrane and serum of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 1992, 19: 677-681.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Hamerman D, Gresser I, Smith C: Isolation of cytomegalovirus from synovial cells of a patient with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 1982, 9: 658-664.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Mehraein Y, Lennerz C, Ehlhardt S, Remberger K, Ojak A, Zang KD: Latent Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection and cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in synovial tissue of autoimmune chronic arthritis determined by RNA- and DNA-in situ hybridization. Mod Pathol. 2004, 17: 781-789. 10.1038/modpathol.3800119.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  91. Murayama T, Jisaki F, Ayata M, Sakamuro D, Hironaka T, Hirai K, Tsuchiya N, Ito K, Furukawa T: Cytomegalovirus genomes demonstrated by polymerase chain reaction in synovial fluid from rheumatoid arthritis patients. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 1992, 10: 161-164.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Zhang C, Shen K, Jiang Z, He X: Early diagnosis and monitoring of active HCMV infection in children with systemic lupus erythematosus. Chin Med J (Engl). 2001, 114: 1309-1312.Google Scholar
  93. Nawata M, Seta N, Yamada M, Sekigawa I, Lida N, Hashimoto H: Possible triggering effect of cytomegalovirus infection on systemic lupus erythematosus. Scand J Rheumatol. 2001, 30: 360-362. 10.1080/030097401317148570.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  94. Hayashi T, Lee S, Ogasawara H, Sekigawa I, Iida N, Tomino Y, Hashimoto H, Hirose S: Exacerbation of systemic lupus erythematosus related to cytomegalovirus infection. Lupus. 1998, 7: 561-564. 10.1191/096120398678920596.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  95. Vasquez V, Barzaga RA, Cunha BA: Cytomegalovirus-induced flare of systemic lupus erythematosus. Heart Lung. 1992, 21: 407-408.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Sekigawa I, Nawata M, Seta N, Yamada M, Iida N, Hashimoto H: Cytomegalovirus infection in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2002, 20: 559-564.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Cunha BA, Gouzhva O, Nausheen S: Severe cytomegalovirus (CMV) community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) precipitating a systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) flare. Heart Lung. 2009, 38: 249-252. 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2008.07.001.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  98. Su BY, Su CY, Yu SF, Chen CJ: Incidental discovery of high systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity associated with cytomegalovirus viral activity. Med Microbiol Immunol. 2007, 196: 165-170. 10.1007/s00430-007-0040-7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  99. Barzilai O, Sherer Y, Ram M, Izhaky D, Anaya JM, Shoenfeld Y: Epstein-Barr virus and cytomegalovirus in autoimmune diseases: are they truly notorious? A preliminary report. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007, 1108: 567-577. 10.1196/annals.1422.059.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  100. Chang M, Pan MR, Chen DY, Lan JL: Human cytomegalovirus pp65 lower matrix protein: a humoral immunogen for systemic lupus erythematosus patients and autoantibody accelerator for NZB/W F1 mice. Clin Exp Immunol. 2006, 143: 167-179. 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2005.02974.x.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  101. Berkun Y, Zandman-Goddard G, Barzilai O, Boaz M, Sherer Y, Larida B, Blank M, Anaya JM, Shoenfeld Y: Infectious antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus patients. Lupus. 2009, 18: 1129-1135. 10.1177/0961203309345729.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  102. Boeckh M, Nichols WG: Immunosuppressive effects of beta-herpesviruses. Herpes. 2003, 10: 12-16.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. George MJ, Snydman DR, Werner BG, Griffith J, Falagas ME, Dougherty NN, Rubin RH: The independent role of cytomegalovirus as a risk factor for invasive fungal disease in orthotopic liver transplant recipients. Boston Center for Liver Transplantation CMVIG-Study Group. Cytogam, MedImmune, Inc. Gaithersburg, Maryland. Am J Med. 1997, 103: 106-113. 10.1016/S0002-9343(97)80021-6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  104. Kalil AC, Levitsky J, Lyden E, Stoner J, Freifeld AG: Meta-analysis: the efficacy of strategies to prevent organ disease by cytomegalovirus in solid organ transplant recipients. Ann Intern Med. 2005, 143: 870-880.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  105. Hodson EM, Jones CA, Webster AC, Strippoli GF, Barclay PG, Kable K, Vimalachandra D, Craig JC: Antiviral medications to prevent cytomegalovirus disease and early death in recipients of solid-organ transplants: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Lancet. 2005, 365: 2105-2115. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66553-1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  106. Razonable RR, Paya CV: The impact of human herpesvirus-6 and -7 infection on the outcome of liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2002, 8: 651-658. 10.1053/jlts.2002.34966.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  107. Razonable RR, Burak KW, van Cruijsen H, Brown RA, Charlton MR, Smith TF, Espy MJ, Kremers W, Wilson JA, Groettum C, et al: The pathogenesis of hepatitis C virus is influenced by cytomegalovirus. Clin Infect Dis. 2002, 35: 974-981. 10.1086/342911.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  108. Franco A, Jimenez L, Sillero C, Trigueros M, Gonzalez D, Alcaraz E, Olivares J: [Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders in renal transplantation: two decades of experience]. Nefrologia. 2010, 30: 669-675.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. Walker RC, Marshall WF, Strickler JG, Wiesner RH, Velosa JA, Habermann TM, McGregor CG, Paya CV: Pretransplantation assessment of the risk of lymphoproliferative disorder. Clin Infect Dis. 1995, 20: 1346-1353. 10.1093/clinids/20.5.1346.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  110. Manez R, Breinig MC, Linden P, Wilson J, Torre-Cisneros J, Kusne S, Dummer S, Ho M: Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease in primary Epstein-Barr virus infection after liver transplantation: the role of cytomegalovirus disease. J Infect Dis. 1997, 176: 1462-1467. 10.1086/514142.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  111. Kim JM, Lee SK, Kim SJ, Joh JW, Kwon CH, Choe YH, Shin M, Kim EY, Moon JI, Jung GO, et al: Risk factors for posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder in pediatric liver transplant recipients with cytomegalovirus antigenemia. Transplant Proc. 2010, 42: 895-899. 10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.02.042.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  112. Caillard S, Dharnidharka V, Agodoa L, Bohen E, Abbott K: Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders after renal transplantation in the United States in era of modern immunosuppression. Transplantation. 2005, 80: 1233-1243. 10.1097/ ArticleGoogle Scholar
  113. Schubert S, Abdul-Khaliq H, Lehmkuhl HB, Yegitbasi M, Reinke P, Kebelmann-Betzig C, Hauptmann K, Gross-Wieltsch U, Hetzer R, Berger F: Diagnosis and treatment of post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder in pediatric heart transplant patients. Pediatr Transplant. 2009, 13: 54-62. 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2008.00969.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  114. Nichols WG, Corey L, Gooley T, Davis C, Boeckh M: High risk of death due to bacterial and fungal infection among cytomegalovirus (CMV)-seronegative recipients of stem cell transplants from seropositive donors: evidence for indirect effects of primary CMV infection. J Infect Dis. 2002, 185: 273-282. 10.1086/338624.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  115. Prentice HG, Gluckman E, Powles RL, Ljungman P, Milpied N, Fernandez Ranada JM, Mandelli F, Kho P, Kennedy L, Bell AR: Impact of long-term acyclovir on cytomegalovirus infection and survival after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. European Acyclovir for CMV Prophylaxis Study Group. Lancet. 1994, 343: 749-753. 10.1016/S0140-6736(94)91835-X.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  116. Ljungman P, Brand R, Einsele H, Frassoni F, Niederwieser D, Cordonnier C: Donor CMV serologic status and outcome of CMV-seropositive recipients after unrelated donor stem cell transplantation: an EBMT megafile analysis. Blood. 2003, 102: 4255-4260. 10.1182/blood-2002-10-3263.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  117. Boeckh M, Nichols WG: The impact of cytomegalovirus serostatus of donor and recipient before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the era of antiviral prophylaxis and preemptive therapy. Blood. 2004, 103: 2003-2008. 10.1182/blood-2003-10-3616.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  118. Tong CY, Bakran A, Peiris JS, Muir P, Herrington CS: The association of viral infection and chronic allograft nephropathy with graft dysfunction after renal transplantation. Transplantation. 2002, 74: 576-578. 10.1097/00007890-200208270-00026.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  119. Snyder LD, Finlen-Copeland CA, Turbyfill WJ, Howell D, Willner DA, Palmer SM: Cytomegalovirus pneumonitis is a risk for bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome in lung transplantation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 181: 1391-1396. 10.1164/rccm.200911-1786OC.
  120. Humar A, Gillingham KJ, Payne WD, Dunn DL, Sutherland DE, Matas AJ: Association between cytomegalovirus disease and chronic rejection in kidney transplant recipients. Transplantation. 1999, 68: 1879-1883. 10.1097/00007890-199912270-00011.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  121. Falagas ME, Snydman DR, Griffith J, Ruthazer R, Werner BG: Effect of cytomegalovirus infection status on first-year mortality rates among orthotopic liver transplant recipients. The Boston Center for Liver Transplantation CMVIG Study Group. Ann Intern Med. 1997, 126: 275-279.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  122. Grattan MT, Moreno-Cabral CE, Starnes VA, Oyer PE, Stinson EB, Shumway NE: Cytomegalovirus infection is associated with cardiac allograft rejection and atherosclerosis. Jama. 1989, 261: 3561-3566. 10.1001/jama.261.24.3561.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  123. Hussain T, Burch M, Fenton MJ, Whitmore PM, Rees P, Elliott M, Aurora P: Positive pretransplantation cytomegalovirus serology is a risk factor for cardiac allograft vasculopathy in children. Circulation. 2007, 115: 1798-1805. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.627570.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  124. Billingham ME: Histopathology of graft coronary disease. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1992, 11: S38-44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  125. Weill D: Role of cytomegalovirus in cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Transpl Infect Dis. 2001, 3 (Suppl 2): 44-48. 10.1034/j.1399-3062.2001.00009.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  126. Wu TC, Hruban RH, Ambinder RF, Pizzorno M, Cameron DE, Baumgartner WA, Reitz BA, Hayward GS, Hutchins GM: Demonstration of cytomegalovirus nucleic acids in the coronary arteries of transplanted hearts. Am J Pathol. 1992, 140: 739-747.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  127. Tu W, Potena L, Stepick-Biek P, Liu L, Dionis KY, Luikart H, Fearon WF, Holmes TH, Chin C, Cooke JP, et al: T-cell immunity to subclinical cytomegalovirus infection reduces cardiac allograft disease. Circulation. 2006, 114: 1608-1615. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.607549.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  128. Pouria S, State OI, Wong W, Hendry BM: CMV infection is associated with transplant renal artery stenosis. Qjm. 1998, 91: 185-189. 10.1093/qjmed/91.3.185.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  129. Chmiel C, Speich R, Hofer M, Michel D, Mertens T, Weder W, Boehler A: Ganciclovir/valganciclovir prophylaxis decreases cytomegalovirus-related events and bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome after lung transplantation. Clin Infect Dis. 2008, 46: 831-839. 10.1086/528689.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  130. Lowance D, Neumayer HH, Legendre CM, Squifflet JP, Kovarik J, Brennan PJ, Norman D, Mendez R, Keating MR, Coggon GL, et al: Valacyclovir for the prevention of cytomegalovirus disease after renal transplantation. International Valacyclovir Cytomegalovirus Prophylaxis Transplantation Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1999, 340: 1462-1470. 10.1056/NEJM199905133401903.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  131. Valantine HA, Gao SZ, Menon SG, Renlund DG, Hunt SA, Oyer P, Stinson EB, Brown BW, Merigan TC, Schroeder JS: Impact of prophylactic immediate posttransplant ganciclovir on development of transplant atherosclerosis: a post hoc analysis of a randomized, placebo-controlled study. Circulation. 1999, 100: 61-66.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  132. Fiddian P, Sabin CA, Griffiths PD: Valacyclovir provides optimum acyclovir exposure for prevention of cytomegalovirus and related outcomes after organ transplantation. J Infect Dis. 2002, 186 (Suppl 1): S110-115. 10.1086/342965.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  133. Slifkin M, Ruthazer R, Freeman R, Bloom J, Fitzmaurice S, Fairchild R, Angelis M, Cooper J, Barefoot L, Rohrer R, et al: Impact of cytomegalovirus prophylaxis on rejection following orthotopic liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2005, 11: 1597-1602. 10.1002/lt.20523.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  134. Miller W, Flynn P, McCullough J, Balfour HH, Goldman A, Haake R, McGlave P, Ramsay N, Kersey J: Cytomegalovirus infection after bone marrow transplantation: an association with acute graft-v-host disease. Blood. 1986, 67: 1162-1167.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  135. Ljungman P, Perez-Bercoff L, Jonsson J, Avetisyan G, Sparrelid E, Aschan J, Barkholt L, Larsson K, Winiarski J, Yun Z, et al: Risk factors for the development of cytomegalovirus disease after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Haematologica. 2006, 91: 78-83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  136. Cantoni N, Hirsch HH, Khanna N, Gerull S, Buser A, Bucher C, Halter J, Heim D, Tichelli A, Gratwohl A, et al: Evidence for a bidirectional relationship between cytomegalovirus replication and acute graft-versus-host disease. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2010, 16: 1309-1314. 10.1016/j.bbmt.2010.03.020.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  137. Matthes-Martin S, Aberle SW, Peters C, Holter W, Popow-Kraupp T, Potschger U, Fritsch G, Ladenstein R, Rosenmayer A, Dieckmann K, et al: CMV-viraemia during allogenic bone marrow transplantation in paediatric patients: association with survival and graft-versus-host disease. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1998, 21 (Suppl 2): S53-56.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  138. Wang LR, Dong LJ, Zhang MJ, Lu DP: Correlations of human herpesvirus 6B and CMV infection with acute GVHD in recipients of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2008, 42: 673-677. 10.1038/bmt.2008.238.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  139. Broers AE, van Der Holt R, van Esser JW, Gratama JW, Henzen-Logmans S, Kuenen-Boumeester V, Lowenberg B, Cornelissen JJ: Increased transplant-related morbidity and mortality in CMV-seropositive patients despite highly effective prevention of CMV disease after allogeneic T-cell-depleted stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2000, 95: 2240-2245.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  140. Lonnqvist B, Ringden O, Wahren B, Gahrton G, Lundgren G: Cytomegalovirus infection associated with and preceding chronic graft-versus-host disease. Transplantation. 1984, 38: 465-468. 10.1097/00007890-198411000-00004.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  141. Larsson K, Aschan J, Remberger M, Ringden O, Winiarski J, Ljungman P: Reduced risk for extensive chronic graft-versus-host disease in patients receiving transplants with human leukocyte antigen-identical sibling donors given polymerase chain reaction-based preemptive therapy against cytomegalovirus. Transplantation. 2004, 77: 526-531. 10.1097/01.TP.0000109778.39235.F4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  142. Ljungman P, de La Camara R, Milpied N, Volin L, Russell CA, Crisp A, Webster A: Randomized study of valacyclovir as prophylaxis against cytomegalovirus reactivation in recipients of allogeneic bone marrow transplants. Blood. 2002, 99: 3050-3056. 10.1182/blood.V99.8.3050.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  143. Michelson S: Consequences of human cytomegalovirus mimicry. Hum Immunol. 2004, 65: 465-475. 10.1016/j.humimm.2004.02.002.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  144. Hutt-Fletcher LM, Balachandran N, Elkins MH: B cell activation by cytomegalovirus. J Exp Med. 1983, 158: 2171-2176. 10.1084/jem.158.6.2171.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  145. Varani S, Cederarv M, Feld S, Tammik C, Frascaroli G, Landini MP, Soderberg-Naucler C: Human cytomegalovirus differentially controls B cell and T cell responses through effects on plasmacytoid dendritic cells. J Immunol. 2007, 179: 7767-7776.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  146. Homs S, Mansour H, Desvaux D, Diet C, Hazan M, Buchler M, Lebranchu Y, Buob D, Badoual C, Matignon M, et al: Predominant Th1 and cytotoxic phenotype in biopsies from renal transplant recipients with transplant glomerulopathy. Am J Transplant. 2009, 9: 1230-1236. 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02596.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  147. Lamprecht P, Gross WL: Wegener's granulomatosis. Herz. 2004, 29: 47-56. 10.1007/s00059-004-2525-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  148. Kobayashi T, Okamoto S, Iwakami Y, Nakazawa A, Hisamatsu T, Chinen H, Kamada N, Imai T, Goto H, Hibi T: Exclusive increase of CX3CR1+CD28-CD4+ T cells in inflammatory bowel disease and their recruitment as intraepithelial lymphocytes. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2007, 13: 837-846. 10.1002/ibd.20113.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  149. Thewissen M, Linsen L, Somers V, Geusens P, Raus J, Stinissen P: Premature immunosenescence in rheumatoid arthritis and multiple sclerosis patients. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2005, 1051: 255-262. 10.1196/annals.1361.066.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  150. Fasth AE, Dastmalchi M, Rahbar A, Salomonsson S, Pandya JM, Lindroos E, Nennesmo I, Malmberg KJ, Soderberg-Naucler C, Trollmo C, et al: T cell infiltrates in the muscles of patients with dermatomyositis and polymyositis are dominated by CD28null T cells. J Immunol. 2009, 183: 4792-4799. 10.4049/jimmunol.0803688.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  151. Thewissen M, Somers V, Hellings N, Fraussen J, Damoiseaux J, Stinissen P: CD4+CD28null T cells in autoimmune disease: pathogenic features and decreased susceptibility to immunoregulation. J Immunol. 2007, 179: 6514-6523.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  152. Komocsi A, Lamprecht P, Csernok E, Mueller A, Holl-Ulrich K, Seitzer U, Moosig F, Schnabel A, Gross WL: Peripheral blood and granuloma CD4(+)CD28(-) T cells are a major source of interferon-gamma and tumor necrosis factor-alpha in Wegener's granulomatosis. Am J Pathol. 2002, 160: 1717-1724. 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)61118-2.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  153. Gerli R, Schillaci G, Giordano A, Bocci EB, Bistoni O, Vaudo G, Marchesi S, Pirro M, Ragni F, Shoenfeld Y, et al: CD4+CD28- T lymphocytes contribute to early atherosclerotic damage in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Circulation. 2004, 109: 2744-2748. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000131450.66017.B3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  154. van Leeuwen EM, Remmerswaal EB, Vossen MT, Rowshani AT, Wertheim-van Dillen PM, van Lier RA, ten Berge IJ: Emergence of a CD4+CD28- granzyme B+, cytomegalovirus-specific T cell subset after recovery of primary cytomegalovirus infection. J Immunol. 2004, 173: 1834-1841.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  155. Prosch S, Staak K, Stein J, Liebenthal C, Stamminger T, Volk HD, Kruger DH: Stimulation of the human cytomegalovirus IE enhancer/promoter in HL-60 cells by TNFalpha is mediated via induction of NF-kappaB. Virology. 1995, 208: 197-206. 10.1006/viro.1995.1143.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  156. Zhu H, Cong JP, Yu D, Bresnahan WA, Shenk TE: Inhibition of cyclooxygenase 2 blocks human cytomegalovirus replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002, 99: 3932-3937. 10.1073/pnas.052713799.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  157. Qiu H, Straat K, Rahbar A, Wan M, Soderberg-Naucler C, Haeggstrom JZ: Human CMV infection induces 5-lipoxygenase expression and leukotriene B4 production in vascular smooth muscle cells. J Exp Med. 2008, 205: 19-24. 10.1084/jem.20070201.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  158. Sinzger C, Plachter B, Grefte A, The TH, Jahn G: Tissue macrophages are infected by human cytomegalovirus in vivo. J Infect Dis. 1996, 173: 240-245. 10.1093/infdis/173.1.240.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  159. Riegler S, Hebart H, Einsele H, Brossart P, Jahn G, Sinzger C: Monocyte-derived dendritic cells are permissive to the complete replicative cycle of human cytomegalovirus. J Gen Virol. 2000, 81: 393-399.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  160. Frascaroli G, Varani S, Blankenhorn N, Pretsch R, Bacher M, Leng L, Bucala R, Landini MP, Mertens T: Human cytomegalovirus paralyzes macrophage motility through down-regulation of chemokine receptors, reorganization of the cytoskeleton, and release of macrophage migration inhibitory factor. J Immunol. 2009, 182: 477-488.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  161. Beck K, Meyer-Konig U, Weidmann M, Nern C, Hufert FT: Human cytomegalovirus impairs dendritic cell function: a novel mechanism of human cytomegalovirus immune escape. Eur J Immunol. 2003, 33: 1528-1538. 10.1002/eji.200323612.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  162. Varani S, Frascaroli G, Homman-Loudiyi M, Feld S, Landini MP, Soderberg-Naucler C: Human cytomegalovirus inhibits the migration of immature dendritic cells by down-regulating cell-surface CCR1 and CCR5. J Leukoc Biol. 2005, 77: 219-228. 10.1189/jlb.0504301.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  163. Somer T, Finegold SM: Vasculitides associated with infections, immunization, and antimicrobial drugs. Clin Infect Dis. 1995, 20: 1010-1036. 10.1093/clinids/20.4.1010.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  164. Rodriguez-Pla A, Stone JH: Vasculitis and systemic infections. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2006, 18: 39-47. 10.1097/01.bor.0000197999.58073.2e.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  165. Streblow DN, Orloff SL, Nelson JA: Acceleration of allograft failure by cytomegalovirus. Curr Opin Immunol. 2007, 19: 577-582. 10.1016/j.coi.2007.07.012.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  166. Kahl M, Siegel-Axel D, Stenglein S, Jahn G, Sinzger C: Efficient lytic infection of human arterial endothelial cells by human cytomegalovirus strains. J Virol. 2000, 74: 7628-7635. 10.1128/JVI.74.16.7628-7635.2000.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  167. Ho DD, Rota TR, Andrews CA, Hirsch MS: Replication of human cytomegalovirus in endothelial cells. J Infect Dis. 1984, 150: 956-957. 10.1093/infdis/150.6.956.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  168. Fish KN, Soderberg-Naucler C, Mills LK, Stenglein S, Nelson JA: Human cytomegalovirus persistently infects aortic endothelial cells. J Virol. 1998, 72: 5661-5668.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  169. Shen YH, Zhang L, Utama B, Wang J, Gan Y, Wang X, Wang J, Chen L, Vercellotti GM, Coselli JS, et al: Human cytomegalovirus inhibits Akt-mediated eNOS activation through upregulating PTEN (phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome 10). Cardiovasc Res. 2006, 69: 502-511. 10.1016/j.cardiores.2005.10.007.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  170. Craigen JL, Yong KL, Jordan NJ, MacCormac LP, Westwick J, Akbar AN, Grundy JE: Human cytomegalovirus infection up-regulates interleukin-8 gene expression and stimulates neutrophil transendothelial migration. Immunology. 1997, 92: 138-145. 10.1046/j.1365-2567.1997.00310.x.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  171. Dengler TJ, Raftery MJ, Werle M, Zimmermann R, Schonrich G: Cytomegalovirus infection of vascular cells induces expression of pro-inflammatory adhesion molecules by paracrine action of secreted interleukin-1beta. Transplantation. 2000, 69: 1160-1168. 10.1097/00007890-200003270-00022.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  172. Bolovan-Fritts CA, Trout RN, Spector SA: Human cytomegalovirus-specific CD4+-T-cell cytokine response induces fractalkine in endothelial cells. J Virol. 2004, 78: 13173-13181. 10.1128/JVI.78.23.13173-13181.2004.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  173. Bolovan-Fritts CA, Spector SA: Endothelial damage from cytomegalovirus-specific host immune response can be prevented by targeted disruption of fractalkine-CX3CR1 interaction. Blood. 2008, 111: 175-182. 10.1182/blood-2007-08-107730.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  174. Van Dam-Mieras MC, Bruggeman CA, Muller AD, Debie WH, Zwaal RF: Induction of endothelial cell procoagulant activity by cytomegalovirus infection. Thromb Res. 1987, 47: 69-75. 10.1016/0049-3848(87)90241-6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  175. Rahbar A, Soderberg-Naucler C: Human cytomegalovirus infection of endothelial cells triggers platelet adhesion and aggregation. J Virol. 2005, 79: 2211-2220. 10.1128/JVI.79.4.2211-2220.2005.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  176. Goldmacher VS: Cell death suppression by cytomegaloviruses. Apoptosis. 2005, 10: 251-265. 10.1007/s10495-005-0800-z.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  177. Zhou YF, Yu ZX, Wanishsawad C, Shou M, Epstein SE: The immediate early gene products of human cytomegalovirus increase vascular smooth muscle cell migration, proliferation, and expression of PDGF beta-receptor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1999, 256: 608-613. 10.1006/bbrc.1999.0387.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  178. Streblow DN, Soderberg-Naucler C, Vieira J, Smith P, Wakabayashi E, Ruchti F, Mattison K, Altschuler Y, Nelson JA: The human cytomegalovirus chemokine receptor US28 mediates vascular smooth muscle cell migration. Cell. 1999, 99: 511-520. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81539-1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  179. Dumortier J, Streblow DN, Moses AV, Jacobs JM, Kreklywich CN, Camp D, Smith RD, Orloff SL, Nelson JA: Human cytomegalovirus secretome contains factors that induce angiogenesis and wound healing. J Virol. 2008, 82: 6524-6535. 10.1128/JVI.00502-08.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  180. Looney RJ, Falsey A, Campbell D, Torres A, Kolassa J, Brower C, McCann R, Menegus M, McCormick K, Frampton M, et al: Role of cytomegalovirus in the T cell changes seen in elderly individuals. Clin Immunol. 1999, 90: 213-219. 10.1006/clim.1998.4638.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  181. Naniche D, Oldstone MB: Generalized immunosuppression: how viruses undermine the immune response. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2000, 57: 1399-1407. 10.1007/PL00000625.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  182. Griffin D: Potential mechanisms of immune suppression. Viral Pathogenesis. Edited by: Nathanson N. 1996, Lippincott-Raven, 207-235.Google Scholar
  183. Rinaldo CR, Carney WP, Richter BS, Black PH, Hirsch MS: Mechanisms of immunosuppression in cytomegaloviral mononucleosis. J Infect Dis. 1980, 141: 488-495. 10.1093/infdis/141.4.488.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  184. Levin MJ, Rinaldo CR, Leary PL, Zaia JA, Hirsch MS: Immune response to herpesvirus antigens in adults with acute cytomegaloviral mononucleosis. J Infect Dis. 1979, 140: 851-857. 10.1093/infdis/140.6.851.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  185. Reynolds DW, Dean PH, Pass RF, Alford CA: Specific cell-mediated immunity in children with congenital and neonatal cytomegalovirus infection and their mothers. J Infect Dis. 1979, 140: 493-499. 10.1093/infdis/140.4.493.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  186. Fiorilli M, Sirianni MC, Iannetti P, Pana A, Divizia M, Aiuti F: Cell-mediated immunity in human cytomegalovirus infection. Infect Immun. 1982, 35: 1162-1164.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  187. Kapasi K, Rice GP: Role of the monocyte in cytomegalovirus-mediated immunosuppression in vitro. J Infect Dis. 1986, 154: 881-884. 10.1093/infdis/154.5.881.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  188. Schrier RD, Oldstone MB: Recent clinical isolates of cytomegalovirus suppress human cytomegalovirus-specific human leukocyte antigen-restricted cytotoxic T-lymphocyte activity. J Virol. 1986, 59: 127-131.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  189. Schrier RD, Rice GP, Oldstone MB: Suppression of natural killer cell activity and T cell proliferation by fresh isolates of human cytomegalovirus. J Infect Dis. 1986, 153: 1084-1091. 10.1093/infdis/153.6.1084.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  190. Simmons P, Kaushansky K, Torok-Storb B: Mechanisms of cytomegalovirus-mediated myelosuppression: perturbation of stromal cell function versus direct infection of myeloid cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1990, 87: 1386-1390. 10.1073/pnas.87.4.1386.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  191. Torok-Storb B, Simmons P, Khaira D, Stachel D, Myerson D: Cytomegalovirus and marrow function. Ann Hematol. 1992, 64 (Suppl): A128-131. 10.1007/BF01715365.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  192. Randolph-Habecker J, Iwata M, Torok-Storb B: Cytomegalovirus mediated myelosuppression. J Clin Virol. 2002, 25 (Suppl 2): S51-56. 10.1016/S1386-6532(02)00092-6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  193. Frascaroli G, Varani S, Moepps B, Sinzger C, Landini MP, Mertens T: Human cytomegalovirus subverts the functions of monocytes, impairing chemokine-mediated migration and leukocyte recruitment. J Virol. 2006, 80: 7578-7589. 10.1128/JVI.02421-05.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  194. Gredmark S, Soderberg-Naucler C: Human cytomegalovirus inhibits differentiation of monocytes into dendritic cells with the consequence of depressed immunological functions. J Virol. 2003, 77: 10943-10956. 10.1128/JVI.77.20.10943-10956.2003.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  195. Gredmark S, Tilburgs T, Soderberg-Naucler C: Human cytomegalovirus inhibits cytokine-induced macrophage differentiation. J Virol. 2004, 78: 10378-10389. 10.1128/JVI.78.19.10378-10389.2004.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  196. Hertel L, Lacaille VG, Strobl H, Mellins ED, Mocarski ES: Susceptibility of immature and mature Langerhans cell-type dendritic cells to infection and immunomodulation by human cytomegalovirus. J Virol. 2003, 77: 7563-7574. 10.1128/JVI.77.13.7563-7574.2003.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  197. Lee AW, Hertel L, Louie RK, Burster T, Lacaille V, Pashine A, Abate DA, Mocarski ES, Mellins ED: Human cytomegalovirus alters localization of MHC class II and dendrite morphology in mature Langerhans cells. J Immunol. 2006, 177: 3960-3971.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  198. Moutaftsi M, Brennan P, Spector SA, Tabi Z: Impaired lymphoid chemokine-mediated migration due to a block on the chemokine receptor switch in human cytomegalovirus-infected dendritic cells. J Virol. 2004, 78: 3046-3054. 10.1128/JVI.78.6.3046-3054.2004.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  199. Moutaftsi M, Mehl AM, Borysiewicz LK, Tabi Z: Human cytomegalovirus inhibits maturation and impairs function of monocyte-derived dendritic cells. Blood. 2002, 99: 2913-2921. 10.1182/blood.V99.8.2913.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  200. Chang WL, Baumgarth N, Yu D, Barry PA: Human cytomegalovirus-encoded interleukin-10 homolog inhibits maturation of dendritic cells and alters their functionality. J Virol. 2004, 78: 8720-8731. 10.1128/JVI.78.16.8720-8731.2004.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  201. Raftery MJ, Wieland D, Gronewald S, Kraus AA, Giese T, Schonrich G: Shaping phenotype, function, and survival of dendritic cells by cytomegalovirus-encoded IL-10. J Immunol. 2004, 173: 3383-3391.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  202. Razonable RR: Immune-based therapies for cytomegalovirus infection. Immunotherapy. 2010, 2: 117-130. 10.2217/imt.09.82.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  203. Lux A, Aschermann S, Biburger M, Nimmerjahn F: The pro and anti-inflammatory activities of immunoglobulin G. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010, 69 (Suppl 1): i92-96. 10.1136/ard.2009.117101.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  204. Lawlor G, Moss AC: Cytomegalovirus in inflammatory bowel disease: pathogen or innocent bystander?. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2010, 16: 1620-1627. 10.1002/ibd.21275.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  205. Nakase H, Chiba T: TNF-alpha is an important pathogenic factor contributing to reactivation of cytomegalovirus in inflamed mucosa of colon in patients with ulcerative colitis: lesson from clinical experience. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2010, 16: 550-551. 10.1002/ibd.21080.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  206. Soderberg-Naucler C: HCMV microinfections in inflammatory diseases and cancer. J Clin Virol. 2008, 41: 218-223. 10.1016/j.jcv.2007.11.009.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Varani and Landini; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.